CNA540_AT2_S1_2022
Criteria
Description
High Distinction (80-100%)
Distinction (70-79%)
Credit (60-69%)
Pass (50-59%)
Fail (0-49%)
Criterion 1
15 points
Integrate and compare evidenced based literature throughout to support the discussion.
· Extensively integrated recent and relevant research literature throughout your discussion.
· Cited a variety of high-level evidence and other scholarly source to support and substantiate key points and ideas
· All concepts being supported with contemporary evidence
· Very good integration of recent and credible research and literature to support your discussion and substantiate key points and ideas.
· Many concepts are supported by contemporary evidence
· Used a variety of scholarly sources.
· Integrated some relevant references to support your discussion.
· Utilised some credible sources, but scope for further integration of the literature.
· Some concepts, are supported by contemporary evidence
· Used minimal research and/or literature to support your discussion.
· Alludes to a few concepts, some of which are well supported by contemporary evidence
· Further evidence should have been utilised.
· Used few scholarly or no references to support your discussion.
· No or minimal evidence of reading beyond the resources provided in the unit.
· Concepts in the paper are not supported by evidence
Criterion 2
15 points
Critically analyse an appropriate topic related to contemporary cardiovascular nursing practice.
· Demonstrates understanding of the selected issue by clearly analysing and examines all potential problems/nursing issues.
· Topic is relevant to Cardiovascular nursing.
· Demonstrates understanding by identifying and analysing most nursing issues.
· Topic is relevant to Cardiovascular nursing.
· Demonstrates understanding by identifying and analysing some nursing issues.
· Topic has some relevance to Cardiovascular nursing.
· Demonstrates understanding by identifying and describing some nursing issues
· Topic has some relevance to Cardiovascular nursing.
· Presents a case study.
· Essay is inaccurate, does not contribute to understanding and/or is not clearly relevant to cardiovascular nursing.
Criterion 3
15 points
Reflect critically upon nursing practice related to the topic and propose recommendations for future practice
· Strong links to the future implications and outcomes to own practice.
· Provides recommendations for future practice.
· Some examples of what has been learned with most linked to own practice
· Provides some recommendations for future practice.
· Reflects on own work practice but examples but links are unclear
· Provides few recommendations for future practice
· Reflects on own work practice but does not provide examples, some errors noted
· Provides few recommendations for future practice.
· Does not reflect on own practice and no examples are given
· Provides no recommendations for future practice.
Criterion 4
5 points
Writes clearly and succinctly in an appropriate academic structure with references using accurate Harvard Style.
· Maintains all the academic standards by writing clearly and succinctly in accordance with the required Presentation of Assignments.
· Usual referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions are adhered to with no errors as per the Harvard referencing guide.
· The paper is skilfully constructed and a pleasure to read.
· Complies with required word count.
· Mostly maintains an academic standard in accordance with the required Presentation of Assignments.
· Usual referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions are adhered to with minimal error.
· Well written and complies with required word count.
· Mostly maintains an academic standard in accordance with the required Presentation of Assignments.
· Referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions are adhered to but there are some errors.
· The layout and structure are satisfactory but there are sections which could improve.
· Complies with required word count.
· Need some improvement in Academic standards in accordance with the required Presentation of Assignments.
· Have not demonstrated clear expression and unnecessary words are often used and paragraph or sentence structure is too repetitive.
· Have demonstrated several spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.
· Does not comply with required word count
· Submitted work that is not in accordance with the required Presentation of Assignments.
· Have demonstrated several spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors
· The paper is difficult to read due to poor writing style, errors, and layout.
· Does not comply with required word count.